作者 lawyer_qiu on 星期日, 10/13/2013 - 11:56
Exercises
Choose the best answer to the following questions.
-
When airplanes fly over your home, are your property rights violated?
-
No,never.
-
Normally, no, unless the flights are low and frequent.
-
Yes,because you own all the air above your home,into outer space.
- D. Normally, no, based on your right to quiet use and enjoyment of the property.
-
A fee simple absolute is defined as:
-
an interest in land that exists only for the life of some person. :
-
a future non- possessory interest in real property.
-
an ownership interest that can be taken away upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a specified event.
-
an ownership interest in land in which the owner has the greatest possible aggregation of rights and privileges.
-
Until the closing of a sale of real estate, deposits toward the purchase price are normally held: '
-
in an escrow account.
-
by the seller.
-
by the buyer.
-
in a safe - deposit box.
-
In order to hold property adversely, which of the following elements is NOT required?
-
The possessor must have the owner’s permission to be on the property.
-
The possession must be actual and exclusive.
-
The possession must be open, visible, and notorious.
-
The possession must be continuous and peaceful.
-
Who has the ultimate ownership rights to land in the United States?
-
The person who buys the land.
-
The federal government.
-
The local government.
-
A homeowner’s association
-
Under what conditions may the U. S. government take your land?
-
For a private purpose and with just compensation.
-
For a public purpose and with just compensation.
-
Whenever it pays fair market value for the land.
-
For a public purpose,with just compensation and the landowner’s consent.
-
Greg leases an apartment from Meredith. In this situation,Meredith is known as:
-
the lessor.
-
the lessee.
-
the tenant.
-
the debtor.
-
Typically, how is a landlord-tenant relationship established?
-
by word - of - mouth
-
by a lease contract
-
by a court declaration
-
by adverse possession
-
Which of the following does a written lease contract NOT need to do to create a landlord - tenant relationship?
-
Indicate the length of the term of the lease.
-
Describe the property.
-
Provide for insurance coverage of the tenant’s personal property.
-
Express an intent to establish the relationship
-
The landlord is responsible for maintaining stairways, elevators, and hallways. These places are known as:
-
gray areas.
-
common areas.
-
offsite premises. :
-
community property.
-
Rose, owner of Roseacre, granted to Morgan, owner of Diamondacre, an easement of way. Rose then went to Japan to live. Morgan then moved into possession of Roseacre and used it openly and exclusively,paying the taxes,for 23 years. He did not use this easement during that period. Rose returned and tried to evict Morgan from Roseacre. The court held that Morgan had acquired Roseacre by adverse possession. Morgan then sold Roseacre back to Rose who then put a chain across the easement.
Morgan has now brought an action to remove the chain. In most jurisdictions, Morgan will
-
Lose,because he abandoned his easement.
-
Lose,because he did not use his easement for the statutory peroid of 20 years.
-
Lose,because,rather than using his easement,he used all of Roseacre.
-
Win,because mere non - use of an easement does not extinguish it.
-
A deed executed by A in 1992 conveyed Blackacre for a consideration of one dollar, receipt of which was acknowledged," to B for life,but if liquor is ever sold on Blackacre,then to C and his heirs, and if for any reason the interest hereby conveyed to C is not valid, then I reserve the right to reenter Blackacre and take back my property. "In 1994,B died before the wheat he had planted could be harvested. Who is entitled to the proceeds of the crop?
-
B’s heirs. ^
-
C.
-
A. ,
-
Divided equally between B’s heirs and A.
-
Several years ago, Howe sold the eastern two - thirds of his land to Richardson, who soon thereafter constructed an abode there. One year later,Richardson cleared a path from her abode across Howe’s retained land to a road that abuts the western boundary of Howe’s land. This path is very convenient to Richardson’s use of her land and Richardson uses it daily. The path is readily apparent to anyone. In fact,Howe stood by and watched Richardson clear it. Recently, Howe put a barrier across the path.
Richardson now has brought an action to have the barrier removed. The theory which would give Richardson her best chance of success would be;
-
Richardson has an easement by necessity. This would depend on the strength of the court’s feeling about the use of the land.
-
Richardson has an easement by implication. This would depend on whether the convenience was sufficiently strong to amount to "reasonably necessaiy. "
-
Richardson has an easement by prescription. This would depend on the length of time she used the path prior to the erection of the barrier.
-
None of the above.
-
Trespasser T1 captures a wild animal on O’s land and carries it off, confining the animal in a cage on Tl’s land. Trespasser T2 then trespasses on Tl’s land and takes the animal. Which of the following statements is most nearly correct concerning the relative ownership rights in the animal among 0,T1 ,and T2?
-
T1 owns the animal, although T1 may be liable to 0 for trespass; O’s failure to take the animal into actual possession means that 0 lost any claim when the animal left O’s land,but T1 had actual possession at the time of T2’s trespass,so T1 also prevails over T2.
-
T2 owns the animal;O’s failure to take the animal into actual possession means that 0 lost any claim when the animal left O’s land, and T1 has no valid claim because T1 acquired the animal by means of trespass, a wrongful act.
-
0 is the owner of the animal because the animal’s presence on O’s land gave 0 actual
possession;as between T1 and T2,T1 has the better claim because T1 was first in time.
-
0 is the owner of the animal because the law deems 0 to have had constructive possession , as a means of discouraging trespass; as between T1 and T2, T1 has the better claim because T1 had actual possession.
-
A prospective land purchaser named Paul consults Amos,a local attorney, about the legal implications of various types of deeds. Paul’s goal is to obtain promises from the seller to ensure as completely as possible against Paul’s bearing the risk of any title defect. Assuming Amos is a competent attorney in the practice of real estate, what type of deed will he likely suggest that Paul obtain from the seller in the course of a transaction?
-
A general warranty deed.
-
A comprehensive liability deed.
-
A special warranty deed.
-
A quitclaim deed.
-
The Rule Against Perpetuities states that no interest in property is valid unless it must vest, if at all, not more than HOW MANY YEARS after one or more lives in being at the creation of the interest?
-
2 years.
R. 10 years.
-
18 years.
-
21 years.
-
Peter’s mother - in - law, Deborah, was recendy-diagnosed with cancer. It is believed to be curable,but Deborah wants to make sure she"has her affairs in order"in case the cancer becomes terminal. She approaches her attorney, Nicodemus, to ensure that her estate planning is appropriately executed. Deborah tells Nicodemus," I currently own Greenacre and have full title to it. I love spending time there. It’s located away from the city,and it’s so peaceful. Peter has been like a son to me,and if anything happens to me,I want to give Greenacre to him. I'd prefer to possess Greenacre until I actually die,but Id like for it to immediately transfer to Peter upon my death. Is this even possible?" Nicodemus will likely suggest that Deborah'should execute a deed conveying what interests to herself and Peter,respectively?
-
A fee simple absolute to Deborah and an easement to Peter.
-
A life estate to Deborah and a tenancy in common interest to Peter.
-
A fee simple absolute to Deborah and a tenancy in common interest to Peter.
-
A life estate to Deborah and a remainder interest to Peter.
-
In 1992, Johnson conveyed 100 acres of his Red Oak farm in Dallas County to Williams. The deed contained the following covenants; (1) seisin, (2) right to convey and(3) a- gainst encumbrances. Subsequently, Williams conveyed the property to Allen by warranty deed. However, Allen is later evicted by Davidson because of paramount title.
Allen now brings suit against Johnson for breach of covenants in the deed. Judgment should be for;
-
Allen, because the covenants contained in the deed run with the land.
-
Johnson, since no privity of estate exists between Allen and him.
-
Allen,but only for the covenants of seisin and right to convey.
-
Johnson,because the covenants are personal in nature and do not run with the land.
-
A successful merchant named Job decided to remodel his house in 2005. Though wealthy,most of Job’s assets were non - liquid (ncrt cash or easily convertible to cash) , so he signed a promissory note and second mortgage in order to borrow the money from lender L to complete the remodeling. Job has subsequently fallen on some temporary hard times, and most of his assets have been ruined or lost most of their value. As a result, lender L initiates the foreclosure process on Job’s second mortgage. There also happen to be two other lien interests in Job’s property. One of those interests is senior to lender L’s interest;the other interest is junior to lender L’s interest. If the parties holding these two additional interests take no action and lender L’s foreclosure action results in a judicial sale of the property, what is true with respect to the two additional interests?
-
NEITHER the junior interest NOR the senior interest will be extinguished by lender L’s foreclosure action.
-
The junior interest WILL be extinguished by lender L’s foreclosure action, while the senior interest WILL NOT be extinguished by lender L’s foreclosure action.
-
The junior interest WILL NOT be extinguished by lender L’s foreclosure action, while the senior interest WILL be extinguished by lender L’s foreclosure action.
-
BOTH the junior interest AND the senior interest will be extinguished by lender L’s foreclosure action.
-
Which of the following is a specifically marital estate (a form of estate ONLY held by married couples) ?
-
Joint tenancy.
-
Tenancy by the entirety.
-
Survivorship tenancy.
-
Tenancy in common.
-
In a________________ ,each tenant has an undivided interest in the entire property.
Each tenant has the right to possession of the whole property. There is no right of survivorship.
-
tenancy in common
-
joint tenancy
-
tenance by the entirety
-
none of the above
-
D builds a garage on what he and his neighbor both believe to be D’s land. Latera re-
survey of the land establishes that the garage extends 2 inches into P’s land.
-
D is not liable to P for trespass because he does not live in the garage and thus is not occupying P’s land.
-
D is not liable to P for trespass because the invasion of P’s land is de minimus.
-
D is not liable to P for trespass because he had no intent to enter onto P’s land.
-
D is liable to P for trespass because he built on P’s property.
-
Which type of tenancy may be terminated by the decision of either the landlord or the tenant at any time (without waiting for the expiration of some agreed - upon amount of time) ?
-
Tenancy at sufferance.
-
Tenancy for years.
-
Tenancy at will.
-
Periodic tenancy.
-
An individual who has a right to use some piece of real property for a special purpose but no right to possess that real property holds what kind of interest?
A- An easement.
-
A purchase money security interest.
-
A shifting profitable interest.
-
An interest in temporary.
-
If Ginger gives her mother,Betty,a right to live in and use Ginger’s beachfront house in Maine until Betty dies, Betty gets what kind of ownership interest?
-
an easement
-
a future interest
-
a profit
-
a life estate
-
If Betty gives her friend Roger the right to walk his Irish wolfhound across her property to the beach, what kind of property right does Roger acquire?
-
a life estate ... ~
-
a possessory interest
-
a profit
-
an easement
-
Wanda and Hugo own Blackacre as joint tenants. If Wanda transfers her interest, by quitclaim deed to Louis, without Hugo’s knowledge, what interest, if any, does Louis have in Blackacre?
-
no interest.
-
an undivided one - half interest with right of survivorship.
-
an undivided one - half interest without right of survivorship.
-
a lien against the entire property.
-
Wanda and Hugo are married and own Blackacre as tenants by the entirety. If Wanda transfers her interest in Blackacre by quitclaim deed to Louis, without Hugo’s knowledge, what interest, if'any,does Louis have?
A . no interest
-
an undivided one - half interest with right of survivorship
-
an undivided one - half interest without right of survivorship
-
a lien against the entire property
-
Betsy and Bing Blout owned Devonshire, an antebellum mansion located in the colonial section of Savannah. Betsy and Bing purchased Devonshire in 1962 and held title to the property as "joint owners in fee simple. "This jurisdiction does not recognize a tenancy by the entirety. The Blouts had twin daughters,Millie and Tess. After Millie and Tess got married,Bing conveyed an undivided one - fourth interest in Devonshire to each daughter.
Title to Devonshire is now in
-
Betsy one - half,Millie one - fourth,Tess one - fourth,as tenants in common.
-
Betsy and Bing one - half,as joint tenants with right of survivorship;Millie one - fourth and Tess one - fourth, as tenants in common with Betsy.
-
Betsy one - fourth,Bing one - fourth, Millie one - fourth,Tess one - fourth, as tenants in common.
-
Betsy and Bing as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
-
In 2000,Baker,being owner in fee simple of Greenacre conveyed the property by warranty deed to Clark. In 2002,Clark gave Evans a mortgage on Greenacre to secure a loan from Evans to Clark in the amount of $50,000. The mortgage was recorded immediately. Two years later,Clark conveyed Greenacre to Davis by quitclaim deed. According to the deed instrument, Davis" assumed the mortgage." Clark then defaulted on the mortgage and Evans brought an in personam action against Davis to recover the amount of the mortgage due.
Evans will most likely
-
prevail, because Davis acquired title to Greenacre by quitclaim deed.
-
prevail,because Evans was a third - party beneficiary under the conveyance between Clark and Davis.
-
not prevail, because the conveyance between Clark and Davis did not effectuate a delegation of duties.
-
not prevail, unless the land was subject to the mortgage.